• Owl@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It’s nice to be sidetracked by the train building and all but where did the cargo go ?

    Pun unintended

  • Strider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Aside from the train being a mess I think audhd people would approve if there also would be a train in pieces 😁.

    That’s what I think would fit but I’m not audhd so maybe someone could comment more qualified.

  • user1234@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I feel strange being one of the few autistic people with little to no interest in trains other than as a means of transportation. That being said, I somehow ended up working in the railroad construction industry.

    • texture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 hours ago

      i doubt VERY much that there is any real connection between autism and appreciating trains. much more likely that its just a “funny” stereotype that influential people made popular.

      in the last few years any remotely orderly and unique interests are equated to “autism”. i think its obnoxious and really wish it becomes less common.

      • Strider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It’s not about trains, it’s about hyperfixation on whatever. It just doesn’t let you go, possibly a life long.

      • Owl@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        in the last few years any remotely orderly and unique interests are equated to “autism”. i think its obnoxious and really wish it becomes less common.

        🙏

      • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The most autistic guy I know is a literal train conductor for a freight line lmao. He always gives us a huge blast of the train horn when he goes by our house.

        Other than that though, yeah autistic people rabbithole into anything and everything. The train stuff and related stereotypes, like “all autistic people are socially delayed and have photographic memory like rainman” are actually super harmful and contribute significantly to under diagnosis of autism. Especially for those who don’t present as “nerdy white guy who builds model trains all day and can only see the world through the lense of advanced maths”.

      • how_we_burned@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        What about non autistics who have crazy train spotting, junkie scale, addictions? I know one bloke who is definitely a normie and yet has a massive model train setup.

        Several in fact

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I agree, it doesn’t resemble typical AI generated content in appearance. It does in form though. It’s like the most “I’ve seen pieces of a train, but I don’t understand what a train looks like or how it works” drawing I’ve ever seen. If the flame is at the back, how would that work with the entire rest of the engine (the cylinder at the front)? Why do the linkages not make sense.

        If this is made by an autistic train fan, this is incredibly wrong. If it’s made by a person joking about them, it’s slightly more forgivable (but still, I don’t think anyone wouldn’t understand the Steam comes from the front).

        You’re right, the perfect edges and perfect circles and all of that make me think it’s not AI slop at first, but even the least careful person I don’t think would make this many stupid mistakes. They’re mistakes you’d expect for something that knows that the shape is statistically expected from trains, but it doesn’t have any understanding of why.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            26 minutes ago

            Yeah, I know of that, and I’m aware it happens. Even still, those designs have the concept right. I don’t see how anyone draws the smoke stack on the front of the engine but then, for some reason, draws the Steam coming out the rear. If they didn’t draw it at all then I think it’s reasonable. I just don’t see how you get to the point of the OP.

            It’s like drawing a bike and drawing the pedals, but the chain connect the handlebars to the wheel or something. It’s just not something someone’s going to do. (On that page, literally everyone who included a chain connected it to the pedals. It maybe do weird things, but that basic thing is consistently correct, because you don’t draw pedals and not understand that that’s where the chain connects.) They’ll draw something that doesn’t function, because the don’t understand how a bike works maybe, but there are some basic things everyone knows.

        • Dæmon S.@calckey.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          @SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml @memes@lemmy.world

          As I mentioned in my other reply to zerodawn, when it comes to the unusual placement of the engine at the locomotive’s tail, maybe it’s a surreal (albeit it would make some sense physically speaking) way to get a traction similar to rear-traction vehicles, so the engine would be pushing forwards, rather than pulling forwards.

          I just don’t get what human would put the smoke stack at the back

          The label inside said panel kind of answers this: autistic individuals, who think in creative and often unexpected (unexpected in the eyes of neurotypical individuals) ways. Perhaps this is why I particularly didn’t find the locomotive physics that strange: I’m myself neurodivergent, so it’s natural for me to think of the unexpected.

          • gnu@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Perhaps this is why I particularly didn’t find the locomotive physics that strange

            The reason why you didn’t think it strange is because you don’t know how one works, because there’s multiple things which don’t make sense otherwise.

            The drive wheels are not the ones at the back but the ones with the connecting rods and piston rods (the pistons provide the drive force). The rods are placed in a way which would prevent the wheels turning if connected in those positions and would typically be placed on the largest wheels of the locomotive (i.e. that big wheel should be the drive wheel if it’s going to be there).

            The smoke should be coming from the very front of the locomotive as the output from the firebox needs to run through the boiler (most of the front of the machine) in order to generate the steam needed to actually drive the locomotive. Having it come from the back makes no sense unless the whole boiler arrangement is also reversed and it isn’t.

            • Dæmon S.@calckey.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              @gnu@lemmy.zip @memes@lemmy.world

              To repeat a comment I just made, adapted to the things you mentioned in your reply:

              As I said during other replies on this nested thread, i visualized this drawing as some sort of old VW Beetle: trunk at the front of the car, relatively small engine at the rear, rear traction. That’s why, at least to me, the locomotive principles clicked in my mind.

              Having it come from the back makes no sense

              Which I particularly understood as a small engine from a rear-traction locomotive… I mean, a combustion engine doesn’t need to be big, just see how old VW Beetles work with engines quite small compared to other cars.

              But, okay, let’s say the drawing is “all wrong” or physically dubious. Why it “must be AI”? Do you people happen to have seen those Rube-Goldberg art pieces? Did Rube Goldberg use AI for his artworks?

              Last but not the least, oh my Goddess! I can’t help but quote the meme: “boy, that escalated quickly”. It’s a meme, fellows, it’s meant to be a meme! Still we’re all fighting over details of a meme! I simply asked someone why they labelled this comics “AI slop”, then it developed into me trying to explain how my neurodivergent mind is visualizing the locomotive as some kind of VW Beetle shaped as a steam locomotive…

              I should disassemble some old VW Beetle someday and make myself a locomotive quite similar to the one in the comics, just for you people to see what exactly I was visualizing when I was stubbornly explaining my perception of an Internet meme. 😅

      • perviouslyiner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The wheel linkages have to be horizontal - think about it, they need to stay the same length as both wheels rotate.

        Also, why is smoke coming from the coal storage and not the engine?

      • zerodawn@leaf.dance
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The first few things that jump out to me are, the smoke isn’t coming out of the front stack, instead it’s coming out of a second stack thats more in the style of an older steam tractor. The second stack and subsequent second smaller steam engine are where a tender box should be. Worst of all is the illustration of the connecting rods/tie rods, i don’t think even a lazy human who’d gone so far as to make the whole image would get that sloppy drawing them so non uniform.

        Even if you didn’t know much about steam locomotives spending more than 5 second absorbing and processing the contents of the image would tell you the smoke is in the wrong spot and the rods that make it go look bad. That is assuming you’ve seen a steam locomotive, which i imagine is the bulk of anyone with access to the internet.

        • Rednax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          The large wheel next to the cabin is also messed up. It means the cabin must be smaller than the track width, since the cabin is squized inbetween the wheels. But in reality the cabin is always wider then the wheel base.

        • Dæmon S.@calckey.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          @zerodawn@leaf.dance @memes@lemmy.world

          Oh, right, I can see it… 🤔

          However, what if the very fact that it’s meant to be a meme about autistic individuals, the kind of highly creative and intelligent person who’d build quite unexpected things in quite unexpected ways (and I mean this positively, especially because I’m (likely) AuDHD myself) would be the reason why the steam engine is “reversed” (at the tail of the locomotive, rather than at the front; the first thing I can think of is rear-traction vs front-traction vehicles, with the former ones pushing forwards rather than pulling forwards)?

          I mean, at least in my mind, it would even make physical sense to have a locomotive whose engine sits on the rear end, pulling the whole mass forwards. And the connecting rods, wouldn’t it be some sort of transmission mechanism so there’d be traction at the front wheels (akin to a four-wheel traction, 4x4 vehicle)? It would make physical sense as well, having the traction shared between the rear wheels and the wheel axis sitting right under the trunk, no?

          But, yeah, the fact that the load is sitting in the front, thus potentially obstructing the locomotive operator’s view… Maybe I’m being too gentle with the meme, maybe you people are right and it’s indeed AI-generated, I dunno. It’s still funny, nonetheless.

          • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 hours ago

            The “load”? You mean the boiler, and that has to be in front to produce the draught to increase the heat in the firebox. But there’s no smoke coming out of the smokebox, but a weird little cube thing on the back is making some sort of cloud.

            The driving wheels need to be under the weight to provide traction. Water and steel is heavier than an empty box so they need to be under the boiler not at the back.

            • Dæmon S.@calckey.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 hours ago

              @ohulancutash@feddit.uk

              The “load”? You mean the boiler

              No, I really meant the “load”, as in a loaded vehicle’s trunk.
              As I said during other replies on this nested thread, i visualized this drawing as some sort of old VW Beetle: trunk at the front of the car, relatively small engine at the rear, rear traction. That’s why, at least to me, the locomotive principles clicked in my mind.

              but a weird little cube thing on the back is making some sort of cloud.

              Which I particularly understood as a small engine from a rear-traction locomotive… I mean, a combustion engine doesn’t need to be big, just see how old VW Beetles work with engines quite small compared to other cars.

              The driving wheels need to be under the weight to provide traction

              Which is the reason behind the rear traction of a VW Beetle: the engine is at the rear side.

              But, okay, let’s say the drawing is “all wrong” or physically dubious. Why it “must be AI”? Do you people happen to have seen those Rube-Goldberg art pieces? Did Rube Goldberg use AI for his artworks?

              Last but not the least, oh my Goddess! I can’t help but quote the meme: “boy, that escalated quickly”. It’s a meme, fellows, it’s meant to be a meme! Still we’re all fighting over details of a meme! I simply asked someone why they labelled this comics “AI slop”, then it developed into me trying to explain how my neurodivergent mind is visualizing the locomotive as some kind of VW Beetle shaped as a steam locomotive…

              I should disassemble some old VW Beetle someday and make myself a locomotive quite similar to the one in the comics, just for you people to see what exactly I was visualizing when I was stubbornly explaining my perception of an Internet meme. 😅

              • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Given VW never made a steam powered rail variant of the Beetle it’s a bit moot. The principles of road and rail are very different. This is why it’s slop.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        “AI slop” or just “slop” has already broadened its definition to mean anything you don’t like or agree with. Think of it as the modern “r/thathappened” or “photoshopped”.

        • Greyscale@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          If you can’t see how mechanically the drawing is nonsense then I worry for the future.

          The wheels are nonsense, the rods are nonsense, it has a pizza oven in the back and the smoke is coming from the wrong end.

          • Dæmon S.@calckey.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            @greyscale@lemmy.sdf.org @Rhaedas@fedia.io @memes@lemmy.world

            “Sir, this is a meme’s”. Lol

            Now, being serious, it doesn’t seemed “nonsensical” to me because I’m neurodivergent myself, while the panel in question is labeled “autistic”, so it refers to an autistic individual approaching the problem of going forward in manners that can seem very unexpected in the eyes of neurotypical individuals. The rear-mounted engine? Think of old vehicles with engine at the rear. It physically makes sense, pushing forwards rather than pulling…

            “Pizza oven in the back”, it’s clearly a drawing not meant to be over detailed, hence the lack of mechanical minutiae which would better distinguish it from a… “pizza oven”.

            But, again, maybe you people are right and this is AI-generated, who knows… I’m just a systematic rando looking at an atypical mechanism and thinking of ways it’d work IRL.

  • Rednax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I agree that the lines look sharp, but the composition makes no sense. The giant wheel next to the cabin is just weird. Why is the wheel bigger? And why is the cabin not wider than the track width? This looks like a tractor, not a locomotive. The steam is comming from the coal storage, but not from the engine. And why does the coal storage have a chimney anyway? Then there are the weirdly shaped coupling rods. These mistakes make no sense in the context of a steam locomotive, but they look plausable. I’m no AI expert, but it certainly is a weird looking steam locomotive.

    I’m starting to think this was designed wrong intentionally. What better way to farm engagement then to wrongly draw a train in a meme about autism, on Lemmy?

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The boss picture is missing a whip - all heirarchy is coercive.

    The leader picture should be identical to the boss one except the leader should be saying “We’re all pulling together!” while whiping.

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      all heirarchy is coercive.

      I’ve been in several bands that had non-coercive hierarchies. We just each knew what we were good at and did our things, and it worked great.

      • Hegar@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        That doesn’t sound like a heirarchy, if you can all just do your thing.

        If the manager or frontman tells everyone else what to do and you can’t decide for yourself or tell them what to do, that would be hierarchic.