• Kennystillalive@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 minutes ago

    Or maybe, just maybe do a new franchise or movie. I’m so tired of going to the cinema and watching the trailers for 9 ouf of the 10 comming up movies being sequals or reboots of old franchises.

  • Folstar@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Nice idea, but you’d never get funding. So lean into it. Instead of remaking flops, demake them. Redo Battlefield Earth or Waterworld on a half million dollar budget. As the world watches your film with effects that would make Sharknado blush they will finally ask “what is art?”

  • gdog05@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    39 minutes ago

    I think I’ve made this comment elsewhere but Krull, Enemy Mine, and Last Starfighter are the top of my list for an effects refresh.

    There’s also no reason why a decent Eragon movie couldn’t be made.

  • JennyLaFae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Instead of the corporatization of storytelling, we should be letting artists tell the stories they want to tell. We should engage with our media more critically and stop chasing nostalgia.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The best example is The Thing. The original film in the 1950s was awkward af. But the 1980s remake by John Carpenter was chef’s kiss. Then they made a remake of a remake and it was meh.

    • cobysev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The 2011 The Thing wasn’t so much a remake as it was a prequel to the remake, telling the story from the Norwegian scientists’ camp.

      The 1982 John Carpenter remake opened with the last two remaining Norwegian scientists chasing “The Thing” until it reaches the Americans’ camp. But they’re misunderstood by the Americans. When trying to shoot at The Thing, which has taken the shape of a sled dog, the Americans instead return fire and kill them. Then the Americans explore the Norwegian camp and try to figure out what horrors killed everyone there, while slowly discovering why they were shooting at a dog in the first place.

      The 2011 film shows what happened to the Norwegians before the 1982 remake. You’re correct, it wasn’t as great of a film (hard to compete with John Carpenter), but it wasn’t exactly a remake.

    • tahoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You scared me for a second, being only aware of the 80s one I thought you wanted a remake of that lol

  • pigup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Because nobody will fund a huge production that’s based on something that didn’t do well. Are you nuts? Are you going to go up to people and ask for 50 million dollars or whatever and say we’re going to take this thing sucked that nobody liked and we’re going to redo it.

    • ttyybb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I mean, they’ve made how many Percy Jackson movies? Pretty sure no one likes any of them.

  • FanciestPants@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Let’s have multiple reboots going at the same time. I think it would be great to have like three reboots of Jurassic Park going at the same time with different directors. I want to see a full length Wes Anderson take on the film, but also a Zach Snyder take and maybe a Danny Boyle take competing on the same weekend.

  • Omega@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I kinda think Event Horizon had a phenomenal concept, but had a C+ execution. If there’s a movie I think needs a remake, it’s that.

    • addie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Completely perfect as it was, no? Stallone and Snipes having a great time chewing the scenery and playing off each other, Bullock perfect as the ingénue that’s down to cyber; lots of iconic ratburgers, sea shells and Taco Bell. Admittedly, the far off year of 2032 doesn’t seem that far off any more.

      If we’re going to be remaking action movies from 1993, then I’m voting for Hard Target. JCVD is amazing at kicking things but terrible at anything that does not involve kicking things; don’t mind some dumb stylish action but you don’t have to be stupid.

      • cobysev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        38 minutes ago

        Taco Bell

        Pizza Hut if you saw the international version of the film. Taco Bell wasn’t well known outside the US at the time, so they changed the restaurant to something more familiar for international audiences.

  • tacosanonymous@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I kinda thought we were going to get a new Howard the Duck for a second. That would’ve been hilarious either way it panned out.

    I think we should take something really underrated but improve it. Off the top of my head, The Rollerblade Seven.

  • anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I only know about that in the case where the film was bad, but based on an great book. The Lord of the Rings and Dune both had bad films made of it.

  • Apeman42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    On a vaguely related note, why aren’t we making more movies that take a Shakespeare plot and just stuff it in a different setting without trying to hide it? Like 10 Things I Hate about you was Taming of the Shrew.

    Tell me you wouldn’t watch Mechbeth.

      • cobysev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        The Lion King (1994) is Hamlet.

        “O” (2001) is Othello.

        Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead (1990) is based on two minor characters of Hamlet.

        She’s the Man (2006) is Twelfth Night.

        Romeo + Juliet (1996) is a modern-day Romeo and Juliet.

        O Brother, Where Art Thou? (2000) is Homer’s Odyssey. Not Shakespeare, but a brilliant modern retelling of one of humanity’s oldest surviving stories. In the same vein as the above mentioned films.

        These are all I can think of off the top of my head. Not to mention dozens of modern Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, and Macbeth retellings over the years. Those three alone are the more popular Shakespeare stories for reinvention on the big screen.

  • Apeman42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    7 hours ago

    They knew how to do this in the 80s. Little Shop of Horrors, The Fly, and The Thing for example. All remakes that far surpassed the cheesy originals.