• Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    In this day, I’m a proud Debian user. (…STS-83 and STS-94 took Debian Linux to the orbit in 1997.) Open Source can into space!

  • WesternInfidels@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Years ago I when I wrote software for a living, I had an argument with a colleague, and I tried to explain to him:

    The “supported” closed-source library he wanted to use was pretty popular because it was marketed by a huge company with a marketing department, or because it had a first-mover advantage, or because there were training events and books built around it, etc.

    The unsupported free open-source library I wanted to use was the most popular library of its kind in the whole world. And it got to that position without any of those advantages.

    What does that suggest about their relative usefulness? The world of open source is closer to being a real meritocracy. The number one app or library is probably number one for non-structural reasons.

    • utopiah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      And that’s why GenAI for code is gaining popularity.

      It’s not because it’s better than free open-source libraries. It’s because it’s better marketed.

      • nandeEbisu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Eh, Claude’s cutting edge frontier models are definitely better than the good open source models which lag a bit behind. The good open source models are still useful though but you’d get noticeably better performance with the closed model which is why even companies that are perfectly capable of locally hosting an open model choose to pay anthropic a premium.

        • utopiah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Maybe but that wasn’t my point. My point is that a lot of people now invest a LOT of resources, being token, money, time, etc to invent the wheel again. Instead of relying on e.g. Drupal they’ll “generate” yet another CMS which will work (for a while, in theory) not because it’s a good idea (IMHO it’s not) but because it’s been marketed as doable and even “better” on some aspects (e.g. customizable).

          • nandeEbisu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Ah, you’re referring to local rewrites of utilities that already exist?

            I agree that agents are making more in house utilities which can be wasteful. The shift certainly isn’t helped by the increase in supply chain attacks though.

    • Decq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I think the main reason most companies choose closed source is because management gets a hard-on for the thought of having someone to complain to. If they can’t call meetings with someone responsible and demand a quick fix, what use do they still have? All you can with open source is fix it yourself or create an issue. Neither requires a manager.

      • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        What? No!

        The point is that it is impossible to have support of every single software you use in-house. So it is better to outsource it to companies who have specialized support on hand 24/7, and who have been solving those kinds of issues every single day of the year. They don’t need to flip through the documentation in order to solve it.

        In companies, a problem that causes the entire company from being unable to generate profit for 24hours costs way more than a support contract.

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Correct. Also, they need someone to delegate the responsibility to. They are mainly concerned with not being held responsible for any potential fuck-ups. If they can say “the vendor did it” they can deflect the blame. Unfortunately that’s how making a career in the corporate world works for the vast majority of people. You advance by avoiding getting blamed for mistakes, not by brilliance or competence.

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        And then after they demanded a quick fix it will be swiftly delivered in next decade

      • SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        A main issue, according to my non-software related work-life experience is also: liability reasons.

        Being able to legally blame someone else when shit goes wrong is a very motivating driver for executive decisions.

  • treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Gotta feel cool to have your software support the people doing the “real” work.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    198
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Unlike Microslop Outlook, there’s a program that doesn’t break when you lose internet connection.

    • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      22 hours ago

      The asshats for some reason felt that they needed to reinvent it as basically a web app and it’s broken in so many ways, and I think it’s lost feature parity with mobile and Mac instead of gaining. Sheer incompetence.

      • WesternInfidels@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The way I see it: Corporate web apps (like Microsoft’s) are evidence that the maker is putting administrative concerns ahead of user experience concerns. They’re catering to the people who actually pay for this stuff, not to the users.

      • stormeuh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Can’t wait for the day Satya Nadella gets fired, hopefully it will happen when the AI bubble bursts

        • jtrek@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          44
          ·
          22 hours ago

          He’s going to keep all his wealth and maybe stroll into a high paying “consulting” gig. It’s unfair. it’s unjust. People who are bad at their jobs and making the world worse do not deserve immense wealth and comfort.

        • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Why? It’s super funny to watch if you don’t use Windows. I hope he stays forever and burns Microslop to the ground.

      • CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        107
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        No, given that one of the points of Outlook (and most email apps) is to store a local archive that can be read even when offline.

          • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            No encryption, probably running SMTP, no spoofing prevention, no compatibility with modern protocols, could it even handle files bigger than 2Mb?

      • can@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Sorry to see you dog piled for an innocent question. We should see it as a good thing that someone who doesn’t know found this space.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Some people are being a bit pedantic about not technically needing the internet for email, and that’s true, but the pedantry is hiding the fact that actually email is really cool in how it exists in whatever form we want it to be in! It can be transmitted over internet, or over bare TCP/IP, or even peer-to-peer. Most applications don’t take advantage of how versatile email really is.

        Of course, Micro$oft makes it rely on an always-on internet connection because it’s better for their bottom line.

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Email is older than the internet.

        Anyway, no, you don’t need internet for the modern version we have today either. You only need it for a few moments.

  • Sergio@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Somehow I feel more “represented” by VLC than I do by any of the astronauts.

    • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I wonder why…
      VLC: a free and open source video player meant to be used by literally everyone.
      Astronauts: a select few chosen people with little to no health problems, in top physical and mental form one could only dream of having.
      I think the Simpsons were on to something when they sent Homer to space.

      • yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        I think we shouldn’t make it looks like it’s easy to be an astronaut. Those people are crazy. They are PhD smart and Olympic level fit. This does not come naturally.

        Edit : and JB from VLC is probably one of the most interesting guy to listen to, if you find some of his talks/interviews

  • yesman@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I pulled this off reddit. I know that’s gross, but this was too good not to share.

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    It is the year 2,002,026.

    Humanity has conquered capitalism and moved off of Earth. Disease and accidental death have been eradicated. We’ve invented marvelous and miraculous technologies and used them to catapult ourselves to distant worlds.

    It’s an open question whether or not our descendants can rightly call themselves “human” anymore, and indeed some on far-flung planets do not.

    On the planet Seffi, which we call Kepler-725c, one of those human descendants watches the end of a two-dimensional audiovisual narrative, a recent fad on the planet. They aren’t watching it on a computer, per se, but on a holographic mesh device operating across a distributed cluster of nanomachines. The human descendant telepathically interfaced with it to launch the application and the narrative, and now xe marvels at how immersive and compelling the narrative was, despite being contained as it was within a two-dimensional non-interactive form.

    A list of people who contributed to the construction of the narrative concludes its display, and the holomesh reverts to a waiting state, displaying a simple black panel within a white frame. And within that black panel, a small, orange-and-white triangle sits, perfectly centered. The human descendant doesn’t know what it originally represented, and muses briefly about it before deactivating the holomesh and walking out of xeir home to enjoy the sunset beneath the purple-blue trees.

  • Pulsar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I remember once I had to work in a very sophisticated and expensive electrical gear that had fixed internal thermographic cameras. The first thing that popped in the HMI were the VLC cones.