Edit: /j

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    55 minutes ago

    It used to be human nature. Nowadays it’s nothing more than social engineering that teaches us what is up is down and what isn’t, is.

  • redti@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Marx didn’t forgot such thing he refuted it. No such thing as " human nature "

  • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Even if you assume human nature is greed, it’s also human nature to have their babies eaten by wolves but I don’t see anyone suggesting we should center our society on baby tossin’ wolf pits.

    • Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Well that’s WHERE youre wrong buddy. Wolf pits are the Last GREAT thang ABOUT this cuntry and I won’t HAVE no liburels Taking them!

      Edit: capitalized more words.

  • Mambert@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Observing humans in capitalism and assuming greed is just human nature is like observing humans on the Titanic and assuming drowning is human nature.

    • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 minutes ago

      One has to wonder how capitalism arose, if the traits which gave rise to it aren’t part of human nature.

    • myszka@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It’s just rejecting your responsibility in the way you behave. “It’s not me, it’s the nature”

  • 🇵🇸antifa_ceo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    You know that humans lived in communal societies for a long fuckin time before all the bullshit we know today, right?

    Human nature is not greed. That’s capitalism.

    • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yeah of course, this meme is meant to be making fun of the idea that “human nature” (whatever that may be lol) in any way disproves communist or anticapitalist theory

      • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You’re right that the best arguments against Marxism are the falsity and over-simplification of economic determinism, and the falsity and over-simplification of the labour theory of value.

    • Stitch0815@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Pretty sure humans have been bashing in each others heads over resources since the dawn of humanity.

      Capitalism made it worse and more efficient tho.

      • turdas@suppo.fi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Half the problem with capitalism is that we aren’t allowed to bash in the heads of the people who took all the resources.

        • ryannathans@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Came here to say this, the problem is the system of government because everyone can be bought. We need direct democracy where there are no representatives that can be bought

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            The mode of production takes priority, capitalism with direct democracy would still fall to the same problems intrinsic to capitalism.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 hours ago

                The government is tied to the mode of production, it isn’t above it. When capital owners hold sway over how society functions, it isn’t through bribes alone that this happens. Control of media, control of the state, administration, cultural hegemony, etc all influence it. As such, no direct democracy could really exist in capitalism.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              13 hours ago

              That’s basically true, but I think capitalism would overthrow direct democracy.

              People would vote for higher wages and then there’d be a coup.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Sure, the base will shape the superstructure. Any levers that can be pulled within capitalism will either be destroyed or nerfed if proven too effective at gaining what workers want.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Thats the thing, if we build a system where all needs were met, it would seem that greed and bashing heads becomes unneccesary

    • auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Sure, but we freely traded with each other.

      No matter how many wish communism to work and devote themselves to it, it will fail. They can hold back agorism indefinitely by great effort, but when they let go, the ‘flow’ or ‘Invisible Hand’ or ‘tides of history’ or ‘profit incentive’ or ‘doing what comes naturally’ or ‘spontaneity’ will carry society inexorably closer to the pure agora.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        This is a deeply idealist view of production. There is no “invisible hand,” no universal Spirit of Hegel. Trade and industrialized production gives way to centralization and the death of competition, and it makes more and more sense economically to plan production and collectivize it as this competition dies out of itself. Communists aren’t “holding back” trade, trade naturally gives way to the very structures that compel communism and kill off trade.

  • myszka@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Human nature on its deathbed when it realizes it forgot to account for Karl Marx

  • hedge_lord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It’s in Human Nature to be violent, which I why I’ve made sure to arm my kindergarten class with knives. Because otherwise I would not be accounting for Human Nature.

    (note: this is sarcastic, I did not arm a kindergarten class with knives)

    • Bigfishbest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      In some ancient text I read it talks about how the ancient Greeks had stopped wearing swords all the time for protection, but there were still some primitive areas where they did. Civilization reduces the necessity and the rate of return on individual violence it would seem.

  • RindoGang@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Me when I take all napkins and salt shakers from every restaurant because apparently greed is just human nature

    • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Common refrain from capitalism fans is that communism can never work because humans are inherently selfish/greedy as proven by their observation that humans are selfish and greedy in the system that rewards selfishness and greed.

          • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            I guess it gets understood a little different when it is not posted in explicitly communist spaces :/

            • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              14 hours ago

              even so. it isn’t a joke and more a reflection of what you think. at least that what it sounds like. don’t blame the audience for the way your joke is interpreted

                • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  I just don’t get how saying a statement you believe is wrong without any indication of it as a joke.

                  Seems more reminiscent to people who say something shitty, then when they get complaints say “it was a joke, bro”.

                  And I personally have no patience for that. Also, there is no punchline, it is just a BS quote.