Edit: /j

  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    The mode of production takes priority, capitalism with direct democracy would still fall to the same problems intrinsic to capitalism.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      20 hours ago

      That’s basically true, but I think capitalism would overthrow direct democracy.

      People would vote for higher wages and then there’d be a coup.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Sure, the base will shape the superstructure. Any levers that can be pulled within capitalism will either be destroyed or nerfed if proven too effective at gaining what workers want.

      • orc_princess@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Even an honest and well meaning politician will be blocked at every step. Like corporations and big businesses sabotaging key supply chains, media engaging in character assassination, and if all that fails then either a military coup or a literal assassination (like they did to Salvador Allende in Chile). Unless the politicians try to gain concessions from the ruling class in exchange for complacency, which means we still have our status quo.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The government is tied to the mode of production, it isn’t above it. When capital owners hold sway over how society functions, it isn’t through bribes alone that this happens. Control of media, control of the state, administration, cultural hegemony, etc all influence it. As such, no direct democracy could really exist in capitalism.