Edit: /j

  • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I guess it gets understood a little different when it is not posted in explicitly communist spaces :/

    • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      19 hours ago

      even so. it isn’t a joke and more a reflection of what you think. at least that what it sounds like. don’t blame the audience for the way your joke is interpreted

        • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I just don’t get how saying a statement you believe is wrong without any indication of it as a joke.

          Seems more reminiscent to people who say something shitty, then when they get complaints say “it was a joke, bro”.

          And I personally have no patience for that. Also, there is no punchline, it is just a BS quote.

            • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              You can’t just say something with no tone indicator (I do not mean “/s”, I mean any indication that it is sarcasm LiKe ThIs, or a clear exaggeration, or an obvious reference…)

              I can’t just say “Socialism is wrong because people are cunts.” and be like, it is clearly sarcasm. that is at best being a Schrodinger’s asshole.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                6 hours ago

                The sarcasm is in taking the common false argument against Marxism and directly showing how absurd that argument actually is by forcing it into a vignette for the viewer, ie a Marx that actually forgot human nature and suddenly realized it destroys his arguments and analysis. That absurd situation highlights the absurdity of the argument.