• Ninja876@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    24 hours ago

    They have insurance, they paid out. Now the insurance company sues the idiot that flooded the building to recoop their losses.

      • Ninja876@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        23 hours ago

        There is no way anyone has that much insurance as a renter. I tried to insure my coin collection (in a rated safe) on top of my renters insurance and the premium was insane. Best you might get is around $25k.

        Also they got sued by all the renters around them for damages.

        • ryannathans@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          See my other comment, but our very affordable home and contents insurance here covers $20 million in public liability

        • Undaunted@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I have something called liability insurance (Haftpflichtversicherung) and it covers up to 10.000.000 € in damages I could inflict on other peoples property. And it only costs me 75 € a year. Nearly everyone here has such an insurance.

          • Zarobi@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Sounds like a good idea. In Australia we have something like that specifically for cars/driving but it would be cool as a general thing

          • Humanius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            20 hours ago

            You got me to double check whether I actually have liability insurance (aansprakelijkheidsverzekering in Dutch)

            Looks like I’m good 👍

              • Humanius@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                9 hours ago

                No. Just like German, Dutch uses compound words.

                “Aansprakelijkheidsverzekering” is two words in a trench coat:

                • Aansprakelijkheid (liability, or more literally: adressableness)
                • Verzekering (insurance, or more literally: assurance)

                You can further break those down too:

                • “Aansprakelijkheid” is built around the word “spraak” (speech), so if we want to be even more literal it means “to-speakable-ness”
                • “Verzekering” is built around the word “zeker” (certain/sure), hence the literal meaning “a-sure-ance”

                So in a way that word means “to-speakableness-assurance”

                Edit: One of the longest (non-medical) words in the dictionary is actually another type of insurance:

                “Arbeidsongeschiktheidsverzekering” (Insurance for being unfit to work (i.e. disability insurance), literally “labour-unsuitableness-assurance”)

        • spankysalmon@fedinsfw.app
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I mean… you’re only explaining why insurance is a scam, not why someone would expect coverage.

          You’re right in that anyone expecting insurance to cover this doesn’t understand the first thing about insurance, but that’s because insurance is a fucked up garbage industry full of grifters.