an_onanist@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 2 days agoEvery generation believing they are the first generation to be fed up with the way things arelemmy.worldimagemessage-square72linkfedilinkarrow-up1327arrow-down119file-text
arrow-up1308arrow-down1imageEvery generation believing they are the first generation to be fed up with the way things arelemmy.worldan_onanist@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square72linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·2 days agoEvidence implies there is proof and ‘Echelon Insights suggested that Republican-leaning voters may have helped Stevens in the Detroit metro area’ is definitely not proof.
minus-squareSoupBrick@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 days agoVolunteer count: Abdul had 10k people sign on to help with the campaign. Polls: Abdul constantly led in the polls. Democracy: Michigan Democrats believe he is the strongest candidate, so the majority voted for him.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·2 days agoNone of that is proof of what you claimed was evidence.
minus-squareSoupBrick@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-22 days agoAh, my bad, I misunderstood that as proof of which D candidate was stronger. I said current evidence of which candidate the Republicans were potentially supporting. Is that source not evidence? Is it just fake news? Nowhere did I say hard proof.
Evidence implies there is proof and ‘Echelon Insights suggested that Republican-leaning voters may have helped Stevens in the Detroit metro area’ is definitely not proof.
Volunteer count: Abdul had 10k people sign on to help with the campaign.
Polls: Abdul constantly led in the polls.
Democracy: Michigan Democrats believe he is the strongest candidate, so the majority voted for him.
None of that is proof of what you claimed was evidence.
Ah, my bad, I misunderstood that as proof of which D candidate was stronger.
I said current evidence of which candidate the Republicans were potentially supporting. Is that source not evidence? Is it just fake news?
Nowhere did I say hard proof.