Since accelerationism was coined in 2010, the term has taken on several new meanings. The term has been used to advocate for making capitalism as destructive as possible in order to cause a revolution against it.
It’s BARELY a change in definition. Most accelerationists in their delusion believe that we can ignore the bad/the contradictions in capitalism as we hasten towards some kind of technological or political salvation that will save us. This meaning just takes away the delusion and leaves the destruction, because that’s actually what will happen.
Lmao the term isn’t from the 2010’s what kind of dumbass wrote that Article? And what kind of dumbass goes to wikipedia for political education?
That’s the same definition with less academic language. Accumulated capital within empire is the most destructive form.
It is also not a definition that fits with what you wrote. An accelerationist is not just someone who “wants bad things to happen quickly.” Even within your doodoo brain definition accelerating the destructive forces of capital is significantly different from just “wanting destruction”. Of course one should not expect anything but asinine reduction of scientific terms from right-wing freaks like you, who do not seek to understand, but merely subjugate to serve your most immediate needs.
Sorry I dont volunteer for organisations started by zionists, nor organisations with a massive issue with nazi infiltration, nor organisations with a massive western imperialist bias with regards to sources, nor organisations with widely documented issues of power users and admins abusing their position. Since Wikipedia is all of that I see no value in wasting my time working on a broken institution, when there are so many other more worthwhile projects.
More importantly, which you conveniently missed, I do not use it as the basis of my political education.
You also missed the rest, but I figure you did that because you got mad I told you I didnt read your hallucinations.
Why are all of you all of a sudden using this term? And why is not one of you using it correctly? I am begging you to learn the words you use
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerationism
It’s BARELY a change in definition. Most accelerationists in their delusion believe that we can ignore the bad/the contradictions in capitalism as we hasten towards some kind of technological or political salvation that will save us. This meaning just takes away the delusion and leaves the destruction, because that’s actually what will happen.
Lmao the term isn’t from the 2010’s what kind of dumbass wrote that Article? And what kind of dumbass goes to wikipedia for political education?
That’s the same definition with less academic language. Accumulated capital within empire is the most destructive form.
It is also not a definition that fits with what you wrote. An accelerationist is not just someone who “wants bad things to happen quickly.” Even within your doodoo brain definition accelerating the destructive forces of capital is significantly different from just “wanting destruction”. Of course one should not expect anything but asinine reduction of scientific terms from right-wing freaks like you, who do not seek to understand, but merely subjugate to serve your most immediate needs.
Well then fix it since you’re so much more educated than everyone else. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone who has the sources to back the edit.
You’re the epitome of this meme: all theory, no praxis
You can just admit you’ve never tried to edit Wikipedia
Sorry I dont volunteer for organisations started by zionists, nor organisations with a massive issue with nazi infiltration, nor organisations with a massive western imperialist bias with regards to sources, nor organisations with widely documented issues of power users and admins abusing their position. Since Wikipedia is all of that I see no value in wasting my time working on a broken institution, when there are so many other more worthwhile projects.
More importantly, which you conveniently missed, I do not use it as the basis of my political education.
You also missed the rest, but I figure you did that because you got mad I told you I didnt read your hallucinations.
Oh the list of organizations you’re not involved in is nearly infinite. That’s why I said “all theory, no praxis”
What an odd response. Do you daydream about everyone who tells you off?