Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca to memes@lemmy.world · 2 days agoDoing our partlemmy.caimagemessage-square160linkfedilinkarrow-up11.07Karrow-down174file-text
arrow-up1995arrow-down1imageDoing our partlemmy.caRat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca to memes@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square160linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSmaile@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down2·2 days agoThat’s just straight up not true, you need to build the dammed things and that leaves s big footprint.
minus-squareAliOski@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·2 days agoOkay so what do you want to do? Go back to the stone age? Get of your phone and follow the ways of Ted Kaczynski.
minus-squarenexguy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoSo it’s either out-of-control consumer production or back to stone age? No in between?
minus-squareAliOski@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 day agoThe in-between was disregarded over a nitpick for it not being “perfectly” carbon neutral. That person would complain because the carbon footprint of my fart is too big.
minus-squareSmaile@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoHow about just acknowledge the obvious downside and not making stuff up, dolt.
minus-squareAliOski@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoWhat downside? I really do not understand what you are talking about. Your only critique is that I said “no carbon footprint” instead of “a much smaller comparatively insignificant carbon footprint”, which in my opinion is just dishonest nitpicking.
That’s just straight up not true, you need to build the dammed things and that leaves s big footprint.
Okay so what do you want to do? Go back to the stone age? Get of your phone and follow the ways of Ted Kaczynski.
So it’s either out-of-control consumer production or back to stone age? No in between?
The in-between was disregarded over a nitpick for it not being “perfectly” carbon neutral.
That person would complain because the carbon footprint of my fart is too big.
How about just acknowledge the obvious downside and not making stuff up, dolt.
What downside? I really do not understand what you are talking about. Your only critique is that I said “no carbon footprint” instead of “a much smaller comparatively insignificant carbon footprint”, which in my opinion is just dishonest nitpicking.