• REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Sponsored by…UNESDA. Literally the same association that fought for this in the first place. This helps my argument immensely.

      • Ghoelian@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        If they fought for this in the first place then why did they sponsor an article discrediting themselves?

        • REDACTED@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Not everything works like Trump being unable to admit your mistakes. These organizations are commonly interested in improving EU, not purely selfish motives.

          • Jiral@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I have no idea where you have the idea from that UNESDA was for tethered caps, at any point. You linked to an ad from UNESDA from before 2020 and quoted a contract PWC study from that time. All against it. Many of the assumptions in that study have become either obsolete or shown to be wrong.