• OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s AI poster or no poster at all. You may prefer no poster

    I’m also on team ‘no poster’.

    I’m far more likely to buy fruit from that place with a handwritten sign on a piece of paper than I am from someplace with a shitty AI slop picture of what a robot thinks fruit looks like. If you’re going to have pictures of your product, it had better be actual pictures of the product I’m actually buying. I don’t want to see some AI idealized picture of it – I want to see what it actually looks like. And, no, you don’t need to hire a local artist for that. You’ve got product to sell? You’ve got a phone in your pocket? Take a fucking photo of it. Put that photo on your poster. Done. No money spent on artists.

    • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Honestly a photo of a couple fruits in perfect condition is not an accurate representation either. It gives the same amount of information as an AI poster: zero. You’re getting lies either way. Perhaps best to just accept that filler images on advertising material is always going to be inaccurate, whether it’s AI or not.

      • OwOarchist@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Honestly a photo of a couple fruits in perfect condition is not an accurate representation either.

        If it’s an actual photo of the actual product, it’s still far more accurate than some AI bullshit could ever be.