Let’s think about what this post implies. There can only be 2 real outcomes. Both of which require using more water. People in the comments have already confirmed this behavior. You and I can’t really be included because we can be considered a bias.

Actual studies also have their own bias that cannot account for most things but the bias alone only allows one to draw conclusions—but cannot prove because of said bias.

I could spend days trying to collect a good number of analysis that take into account all the bias, all the factors that pertain to one country, region, product, time period, everything, and I’d still have to introduce my own bias. or I could do something equally as stupid and ask AI to give me the same thing and people would probably believe it because on the surface it looks like it makes sense–but really, there’s still underlying bias.

If you send 100K USD in cash to me rn, I will give you the best darn looking analysis you ever laid your eyes on.