• CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    And nobody denied that. The statement was “racism was normal in those days”, and not “the n-word wasn’t racist in those days”.

    • CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      13 hours ago

      You’re not allowed to criticize or point out Southern Klans members because it was the style of the time.

      Lemmy’s just becoming worse and worse these days.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        13 hours ago

        …are you okay? automatically assuming the worst possible meaning of ambiguous statements doesn’t seem healthy.

        what about this: “pointing the klansmen out to people back then was harder because the average person was more racist.”

          • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Just because you refuse to understand that acceptance of a word, no matter how foul, was entirely dependant on the region it was used doesn’t mean Lemmy or anyone else is accepting it. People here just understand that Britain in the 1950s was far different in cultural acceptance than the US in 1950.

            Just like the USA using “That’s gay” as a casual insult as late as the mid 2000s is now considered inappropriate today. I’m queer and I know Brits who still say “pass me a fag”. Guess who isn’t upset about hearing that because I’m not a moron.

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            12 hours ago

            they do say that if you always expect the worst you’re never disappointed… but it definitely won’t make you happy.