• antimidas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Which is also exactly what the CRT itself is – not all of the electrons pass through the mask. The difference is, that the actual CRT part has a longer field to accelerate the electrons, meaning the hit the mask or cathode with a higher energy leading to higher power x-ray photons. Modern tubes just had shielding so it wasn’t a concern, the older ones didn’t.

      Technically x-rays are always generated when a particle accelerates. That’s why you can get them even from a high power cyclotron where the particle has a constant force applied on it. The actual CRT creates higher energy electrons and thus will generate more x-rays than the rectifier, it’s calculated simply from the voltage and the overall distance of acceleration. But if the TV had a tube rectifier it’s true that that would generate low power x-rays as well.

      • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Technically, every forward-biased rectifier emits EM of wavelength and intensity depending on materials.

        1N4007 silicon rectifier emits a few THz photons when forward biased.

        Use different materials and you have a LED, an inefficient rectifier but great light source.

        Tube rectifier with high enough voltage

        https://tubedata.jp/sheets/135/1/1DG3A.pdf