time2lose@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 23 hours agoIts like that sometimes.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square45linkfedilinkarrow-up1478arrow-down18
arrow-up1470arrow-down1imageIts like that sometimes.lemmy.worldtime2lose@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 23 hours agomessage-square45linkfedilink
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·21 hours ago No camera can capture what humans can see. Lenses can’t. Cameras can, I think. They have post-processing capabilities in addition to lenses.
minus-squareatomicbocks@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·21 hours agoNo… there is literally not a camera in existence that can reproduce exactly what a human sees.
minus-squareMoffKalast@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·20 hours agoYeah thankfully, cause a human eye sees a thumb sized spot in high definition, and everything else is a smudge until you move the eyeball to it.
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·20 hours agoWhat do you mean? For my eye current digital photos are very close already. Also, I see you introduced “exactly” in addition to your previous comment. And I, in my original comment, used “closer”.
Lenses can’t. Cameras can, I think.
They have post-processing capabilities in addition to lenses.
No… there is literally not a camera in existence that can reproduce exactly what a human sees.
Yeah thankfully, cause a human eye sees a thumb sized spot in high definition, and everything else is a smudge until you move the eyeball to it.
What do you mean? For my eye current digital photos are very close already.
Also, I see you introduced “exactly” in addition to your previous comment.
And I, in my original comment, used “closer”.