• wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        “There is an order to the world” is a phrase uttered only by those enjoying the current order as applicable to them, to someone whom they clearly see is not enjoying the same. It is the taunt of tyrants, slavers, bigots, strike-breakers, fascists, and genocidal maniacs the world over.

        Order alone is not an axiomatic good, and anyone who treats it like it is inherently worth protecting, or like an orderly system is an invalid target for criticism solely for being orderly, is either naïve or is experiencing an unbalanced “order” in their favour. I’ll let other readers decide which they think you are.

        • GladiusB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Absolutely an NPC comment. Go ahead. Change the sky to green to show you “can change into whatever”. No awareness.

          • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            What a sad projection of your own hollowness of self, to say that the very idea of changing corrupt systems of exploitation is synonymous with being incapable of critical thought. I hope you find something to fill that gaping hole in your selfhood.

            We may all be nothing but drops in an ocean, but what is any ocean but a multitude of drops? To dare liken the idea of taking a day off of work to turning the sky green is so pitiful, so utterly incomprehensible a strawman, that it can only have come from someone who is, themself, forcibly repressing their own higher thoughts.

            Please consider your positions (for it is clear that no consideration has occurred thus far).

            • GladiusB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Ok Dr. Phil. What a rod. You looked so deep into my soul and told me. You don’t do shit for a living and don’t understand how having a job works.

              • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 hours ago

                Again, nothing but weak polemics. You know nothing of my background. Even a glance at my comment history would have told you what sector I work in, and the last time I covered for a colleague was two days ago. Something tells me that the accusation of “you don’t do shit for a living” was just more projection on your part.

                Furthermore, it’s quite telling that your first thought when fishing for a name that evokes psychological opinions was Phil McGraw. I don’t need to have any expertise in the workings of the human mind to identify that red flag.

                • GladiusB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  You are not important enough to my existence to go stalking your comments. I’m having a conversation and I don’t agree with you and you had to make it personal because you are a dick. I don’t care what you think about me, my family or anything I have to say because your approach is horrible and one of low intelligence.