Arch is different…

  • diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    News from this year:

    • virtualbox-ext-vnc >= 7.2.12-2 requires manual intervention (package won’t install)
    • Active AUR malicious packages incident (the AUR is locked)
    • Arch Linux 2026 Leader Election Results
    • Breaking changes for all users of varnish, which is renamed to vinyl-cache (it’s a proxy, only affects servers)
    • kea >= 1:3.0.3-6 update requires manual intervention (dhcp server, affects routers)
    • iptables now defaults to the nft backend (affects pretty much nothing)

    Repost.

    Also, my Mint install broke, uh, shit I don’t remember, 5 times? Arch broke zero times. Zero times not my own fault for forgetting I was installing something and shutting off the computer, of course. Except for the times I tried the fucking installer python script, but since I never even booted the install it doesn’t count.

    • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Mint broke for you? That’s the first I’ve heard of it.

      Also if you have a habit of shutting down the PC during updates, check out atomic/immutable distros. They are almost impossible to break. You can pull the power during an update and it’ll be fine.

      • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Mint breaks weirdly often but also it’s inconsistent in my experience. It’s a great example of it explodes for some people and others it’s a god like entity of perfection. Never in-between. Lol

    • insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      this year

      And one post earlier (2025-12-20) that the image likely could be about:

      NVIDIA 590 driver drops Pascal and lower support

      Install nvidia-580xx-dkms from the AUR

      Impact: Updating the NVIDIA packages [without manually changing to AUR packages] on systems with Pascal, Maxwell, or older cards will fail to load the driver, which may result in a broken graphical environment.

    • Kabutor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I dont get the bad press arch got. I use arch (btw) and can’t remember last time it wont boot after an update. It maybe happened to me twice in 20 years and at least once was my fault and the other was because i didn’t read the pacman post warning me

      • silasmariner@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Once it happened to me because 6 years prior I’d made a change thinking ‘hah. That makes more sense’ and then things changed under me and I had to read journalctl in a tty. Low key enjoyed dealing with it. But here’s the thing: most ppl are dead at that point. No idea what to do. Arch is for nerds.

        Edit: this is a completely different thing. I had two issues.

      • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        To be fair, adoption as a concept is the problem not the actual aur.

        The fundamentals of the aur was fine though that entire ordeal. It’s just one optional choice layered on top that wasn’t

        Blaming the aur fundamentally for that choice is like blaming the city planner for when a idiot turns down the wrong way on a one way street.

        We kinda just accepted the risk because the upsides were worth it. But some people are assholes and gotta ruin it for everyone.

        • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          This isn’t the first type of problem that the AUR has had. A few years ago it had problems staying up, because it had no scalability to speak of.

          “Best hopes and wishes” is not an accepted engineering design strategy. If something can be abused, it will be. Not planning for it is just that, poor planning.

          The AUR has been poorly put together and this wave of malware is just another symptom of a deeper problem.