• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    It isn’t “a few,” that’s part of the problem. The entire reason the war is even happening is because the west helped install a Banderite regime after the 2014 coup, which caused Donetsk and Luhansk to secede, sparking a civil war where Kiev began ethnic cleansing against the Donbass region that voted for the former president.

    The Minsk agreements could have avoided the war, but both were tanked by Ukraine and the west. Nazis were emboldened by the new Banderite regime. That’s also why Ukraine and Israel are such close allies.

    • Hettyc_Tracyn@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Russia’s invasion has no good reason… Putin just wants to remake the USSR which won’t be good for anyone…

      • Mindfury [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Putin is a capitalist. He is literally your guy. You got what you wanted in the 90s, millions died, and this is the result.

        Putin is literally America’s favourite Russian President of all time. And no, that isn’t a statement about Trump, because the statement is true for the entirety of the american political class and yankoid empire as a whole. He’s your guy.

      • Alaskaball [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        remake the USSR which won’t be good for anyone…

        The illegal dissolution of the Soviet Union was the greatest disaster of the 20th century. Anything that would actually bring back a scientific socialist state who’s very existence held heel the most wretched capitalist demons that exist would be objectively for the betterment of humanity.

        That said you’re full of shit and should hit the books in you think putin’s a communist or wants to bring back the state of governance that would execute him for bourgeois decadence

        • Hettyc_Tracyn@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          12 hours ago

          The only people who benefit from the people not being entitled to the money they earn is the people in power (the government)

          If people are working and their money isn’t theirs it is theft

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            10 hours ago

            You are describing capitalism. Capitalists plunder the surplus value created by the working classes. Production is already socialized and collaborative, but the spoils go to a tiny handful of people.

          • Alaskaball [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            12 hours ago

            You make the boss $100, you wage is $7.25, your boss is earning $92.75 that he uses to recoup the costs of production then can pocket the rest.

            Your boss then takes that money and pays off the capitalist state to make laws to take more of your money to further subsidize his cost of business while rigging the laws in his favor to make sure competition doesn’t spring up to threaten his bottom line. Your taxes, which should be used for the common welfare of all, is being laundered and sent to further enrich the capitalist class.

            If you think taxes are theft, then working for a wage is slavery

            • Hettyc_Tracyn@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              12 hours ago

              I’m talking about communism, not mere taxes…

              Communism makes it so the guy who is capable of working but sits on his couch all day has the same money as the guy working his butt off…

              I have no problem with when people who can’t work are helped, the problem is when people who aren’t trying to work get to mooch off of the workers…

              Also, most people aren’t working for $7.25… they go where the money is better… unfortunately big corporations have their fingers in the government (on both sides)

              • Alaskaball [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                17
                ·
                11 hours ago

                I’m sorry, are you a boomer? Did you learn what communism is on fox news? Do you honestly to God think the Soviet Union went from a backwater semi-feudal empire that was suffering from famines every 10 or so years to a nation that beat America in the space race several times over within a generation by only having one guy do all the work while everyone else laid around?

                Honest to God, do yourself a favor and at least read Chapter 1 of Lenin’s State and Revolution. If you do that you’ll at least be more learned on some of the 101 level stuff of what communists believe than a lot of the left-liberals that larp as socialists.

              • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Genuinely, how did you come to be so confident talking about a subject you clearly don’t know the first thing about? Like, where did you get these ideas from?

                • Hettyc_Tracyn@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  Because of how Communism and Socialism has only worked out for the party elite, and has been horrible for the people…

                  Look at East Berlin and how desperate people were to escape to the west side of the wall.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                10 hours ago

                We are talking about communism, it sounds like you’re talking about welfare and getting upset at those on welfare and not the capitalists that plunder all of the social surplus. Of course capitalists control the state, the state serves the ruling class.

                • Hettyc_Tracyn@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  I don’t get where you got that from…

                  I said that the problem is when people who are able to work simply choose not to, and feed off of those who do work.

                  Wellfare is supposed to be for disabled people, injured people, and people who are stuck between jobs…

                  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    12
                    ·
                    9 hours ago

                    Do you think that people don’t work in China? Cuba, Korea, Vietnam? Laos? Do you think they didn’t work in the USSR, when they went from feudalism to space in half a century? I really don’t think you understand how socialism works in real life, or how production in the future will be run.

          • GuyIncognito@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I don’t think any socialist society has ever abolished money so far, though it’s an admirable future goal. The USSR certainly didn’t abolish money, they had Rubles.

            • Hettyc_Tracyn@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Also, why is abolishing money a good idea?

              With money it’s way easier to know market value of a good or service…

              Otherwise you’re stuck with chickens per toaster or something equally as ridiculous…

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                9 hours ago

                Money in general becomes superfluous if all production and distribution is collectivized and run along a scientific plan. If you develop beyond markets, why do you need money?

              • GuyIncognito@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Didn’t I say “admirable future goal” rather than “good idea right now”? Eventually, society ought to progress to the point where money is no longer needed, through both development of productive forces and development of societal attitudes. This is the goal of communism. The concept of money is only a few thousand years old, and humanity existed for hundreds of thousands of years longer than it, so it’s by no means impossible.

                Did you ever watch the Star Trek shows? The Federation in Star Trek doesn’t have money. Both because they have replicators and can instantly reproduce any item using only energy, but also because they’re a more advanced society that has moved beyond needing a medium of exchange

            • Hettyc_Tracyn@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              12 hours ago

              I was referring to how the people work and the government takes their money and “distributes” it, but most of it actually just goes into the government’s pockets…

              • TiredTiger@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                9 hours ago

                And who is “the government”? Elected officials? Bureaucrats? Do you think the low-level grunts at the tax agency are living high on the hog? Or do elected officials take your money and hand it to their buddies in the form of lucrative government contracts? And who is elected? Capitalists consort with each other and choose who among them is to represent you. You’re conflating the bureaucratic apparatus of the state with the class that controls it (capitalists) and in doing so losing sight of the actual material reality at play.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                10 hours ago

                That’s not how it works, the people work and capitalists make all of the money, and use the state to prevent people from getting uppity.

              • Mindfury [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                8 hours ago

                please reconcile this thought with police budgets, and then ask yourself what the police actually do and who they really protect

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        14 hours ago

        If only Putin was actually a communist. If Putin actually was trying to remake the USSR, then the world would be in a much better position.

        The USSR had steady and consistent economic growth, and provided free, high quality education and healthcare, full employment, cheap or free housing, and fantastic infrastructure and city planning that still lasts to this day despite capitalism neglecting it. This rapid development resulted in dramatic democratization of society, reduced disparity, doubling of life expectancy, tripling of functional literacy rates to 99.9%, and much more. Living in the 1930s famine would not have been good, but it was the last major famine outside of wartime because the soviets ended famine in their countries.

        Literacy rates, societal guarantees in the 1936 constitution, reports on the healthcare system over time, and more are good sources for these claims.

        The USSR brought dramatic democratization to society. First-hand accounts from Statesian journalist Anna Louise Strong in her book This Soviet World describe soviet elections and factory councils in action. Statesian Pat Sloan even wrote Soviet Democracy to describe in detail the system the soviets had built for curious Statesians to read about, and today we have Professor Roland Boer’s Socialism in Power: On the History and Theory of Socialist Governance to reference.

        When it comes to social progressivism, the soviet union was among the best out of their peers, so instead we must look at who was actually repressed outside of the norm. In the USSR, it was the capitalist class, the kulaks, the fascists who were repressed. This is out of necessity for any socialist state. When it comes to working class freedoms, however, the soviet union represented a dramatic expansion. Soviet progressivism was documented quite well in Albert Syzmanski’s Human Rights in the Soviet Union.

        The truth, when judged based on historical evidence and contextualization, is that socialism was the best thing to happen to Russia in the last few centuries, and its absence has been devastating.

        Death rates spiked:

        And wealth disparity skyrocketed alongside the newly impoverished majority:

        Capitalism brought with it skyrocketing poverty rates, drug abuse, prostitution, homelessness, crime rates, and lowered life expectancy. An estimated 7 million people died due to the dissolution of socialism and reintroduction of capitalism, and this is why the large majority of post-soviet citizens regret its fall. A return to socialism is the only path forward for the post-soviet countries. A lot of Eastern European countries were swarmed with western capital during the destruction of socialism, which is what temporarily caused the rise of the far-right in these countries, but in time their problems will no longer be able to be ignored.

        • Hettyc_Tracyn@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          14 hours ago

          What about all the famines that the USSR had and resulted in their people starving?

          Also communism hasn’t ever worked for groups larger than a few hundred people, because of greed

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Did you read my comment? I said the Soviets ended famine in a region where famine was historically common. Further, socialism worked in the USSR, and continues to work in Cuba, Vietnam, Korea, China, Laos, and Venezuela. Greed did not ruin any of these, greed is expressed in greater degrees in capitalist countries where profit is the goal above all else.