Are we going with Eurasia or an Afro-Eurasia distinction? I feel like if someone were to insist on Afro-Eurasia then they also have to accept The Americas, or I guess it would just be a simple “America” which would get confusing since that’s a pretty common verbal shorthand for USA. Under that sort of definition I think if you still insist on North and South America as regions then you’d have to also accept North and South Afro-Eurasia.
It’d also be pretty funny to try to argue that since North America was connected to Asia within the human timeline it should also be added. Imagine trying to refer to the continents: AfroAmeriEurasia, Australia, and Antarctic, with an optional Oceania thrown in the mix.
For clarity, I usually just go with North/South America, Australia, Antarctica, Africa, and Eurasia as the continental landmasses
Friendly reminder that Europe is not a continent.
If Europe isn’t a continent then neither is India!
It gets called The Indian subcontinent for ~exactly that reason~ but not Europe because of colonialism.
How dare you! Oh, wait, I agree!
Are we going with Eurasia or an Afro-Eurasia distinction? I feel like if someone were to insist on Afro-Eurasia then they also have to accept The Americas, or I guess it would just be a simple “America” which would get confusing since that’s a pretty common verbal shorthand for USA. Under that sort of definition I think if you still insist on North and South America as regions then you’d have to also accept North and South Afro-Eurasia.
It’d also be pretty funny to try to argue that since North America was connected to Asia within the human timeline it should also be added. Imagine trying to refer to the continents: AfroAmeriEurasia, Australia, and Antarctic, with an optional Oceania thrown in the mix.
For clarity, I usually just go with North/South America, Australia, Antarctica, Africa, and Eurasia as the continental landmasses
Excellent Map Men video about this: https://youtu.be/hrsxRJdwfM0