• Bademantel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s incorrect. Nuclear power is one of the more expensive options when you factor in the costs after operation ends, which you should obviously do.

    • 0x0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Remove coal subsidies and factor in newer reactor technology before you calculate nuclear cost.

      • Bademantel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That’s kind of funny. Nuclear energy is actually getting more expensive:

        Source

        A few reasons come to mind:

        • The newer the technology, the higher the cost.
        • Each reactor and its power plant is a huge project. This makes scaling up production difficult. And please don’t start with tiny reactors. We’re not in Fallout.
        • Safety standards have risen.

        There are probably more reasons. I would of course not compare it to coal but to renewables. They’re the future. Storage will be needed but those options are also getting cheaper by the day.