• At7889@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I think this is more so implying if-then statements rather than a literal mathematical representation:

    If there is more cheese, then there is more holes. If there is more holes, then there is less cheese. Therefore, if there is more cheese, then there is less cheese.

      • At7889@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yup! The first premise is wrong, since there is plenty of cheese without holes—meaning that more cheese does not imply or equal to more holes.

        • deranger@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Can’t imagine the weight of air inside the holes is significant compared to the weight of cheese; taking a glance at the numbers, cheese is 800-900x more dense than air. Given cheese is sold by weight, more holes = very slightly less cheese, practically negligible.

          Now I’m curious about how much space a block of 99% holes cheese would occupy. Maybe something like aerocheese, with a whole bunch of microscopic air bubbles throughout.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Also wrong. There’s an implied “than <other object>”. For the first one it’s “than a smaller piece of cheese with the same ratio of holes” and the second is “than a piece of cheese of the same size”.