these “gen-z” uprisings are looking very suspicious.
something is definetly wrong here.
Hm?
just doesn’t seem organic. looking like color revolutions or something.
like last time in mexico, when it was actually conservative boomers.
kind of hard to believe “gen z” is toppling entire governments out of nowhere, without any discernible strategy or barely any news about it. no revolution worked like that.
Oh fuck off with that Kremlin propaganda of colour revolutions. Even if Gen Z protests has external influence, what is so bad about promoting democracy and end of government corruption? As bad as Western interference has been in the past, the colour revolutions tend to be influenced by soft power and no right wing elements. Would you call the French Revolution a colour revolution because it was influenced by the American revolution? Or the overthrow of Chinese Imperial dynasty by Sun Yat-sen because it was influenced by European liberalism? But I bet you aren’t saying anything about Russian-influenced far right movements because you’re a useful idiot for Kremlin!
Kremlin is trying to demonize the colour revolutions because it will undermine their own personal power. It was Putin who helped Lukashenko violently put down protests in Belarus and those in Kazakhstan. If democratic change happens in Russia and their satellite states, their own kleptocratic regimes will decline and their own hold to power. That’s why they demonize colour revolutions despite being organic. Autocratic governments and sock puppets like yourself do everything in their power to de-legitimise grassroots movements that undermine the ruling class’ hold to power.
Kremlin propaganda of colour revolutions
tell that to a third worlder (you are). take a long hard look at your history of sponsoring regime change in the entire world. here is a quick look.
please don’t be unhinged. not everything you disagree with is russian propaganda.
And not every revolution you don’t like is CIA-coup. Oh right, nuance doesn’t exist with .ml. Of course it is in your interest and your pay masters to muddy the water. Again, even if there was external influence on colour revolutions, where is the indication that there is right wing authoritarian elements on these revolutions like before? Oh wait, for the typical tankies, the only legitimate form of revolutions is if it’s a violent one led by your OWN authoritarian and imperial ideals. As expected, you haven’t even called out the right wing movements funded by Kremlin.
i don’t know that much about bulgaria, and i’d guess you don’t either. but it does look off from the all times the exact same thing was reported elsewhere overnight too. and on other places i know a little more about.
i don’t claim to know exactly wtf is happening. you are the one who seem to be obsessed with making this about “kremlin” instead for some reason. i don’t see any connection at all.
If you don’t know anything about what’s going on, what grounds are you basing these movements being suspicious off of?
The reasons are quite discernible.
i clarified my post. not reasons (because we all have many reasons to revolt) but a clear strategy, demands or even much information about it. you’d think a global coordination of that scale would show up at least a little bit.
not reasons (because we all have many reasons to revolt) but a clear strategy, demands or even much information
Such a typical Marxist Leninist bubble view if you are genuine. PLENTY of protests and revolts throughout history happened spontaneously at grassroots level. And the most common reason is being against government ineptitude and demanding to meet basic material needs of the public. The French Revolution, Singing revolution, the 1848 liberal revolution, Occupy Wall street, and even the Tea Party movement are ad hoc. If you actually read world history then you would not be such an antidemocratic simp.
