

Cheers… and I’m sorry for the pathetic question, but why the hell wouldn’t these companies think of this? It seems like such a basic obvious no-brainer to me, again, not knowing the technical details.


Cheers… and I’m sorry for the pathetic question, but why the hell wouldn’t these companies think of this? It seems like such a basic obvious no-brainer to me, again, not knowing the technical details.
Yep, and add the OS itself spying with an unremovable universal ID, by a company who proactively reports on you, and wtf moments really turn surreal.


Right!? I’ll be the first to admit I don’t understand context, windows, or whatever the limit is, but I can’t understand how these large language models have probably exabytes worth of data hoovered up from all over but they can’t remember what I told it either a minute ago or in another chat. I’ve taken to trying to get it to write markdown files to help its own memory, but I don’t know if those are counting against me for context or whatever either.
Not to pile on, but my real grape is the nanny nature of some of these, especially nannythropic. I can’t tell of our times they told me outright that “I won’t do XYZ. This is a hard limit you can’t get around it.” And I’m sitting here like dude you just created that test record to verify the piping you can’t go back through and delete it because it’s a record delete? Le sigh…
Jfc… I had no idea