

I wonder if theres an argument for an automatic down-scaler after watching it for retention, but tying it to the original torrent file at the same time.


I wonder if theres an argument for an automatic down-scaler after watching it for retention, but tying it to the original torrent file at the same time.


if its encrypted at rest, it doesn’t need it.


So, I present my paradox: If the data was sensitive, it wouldn’t be disposed of properly. If the data is irrelevant or encrypted at rest, the disks are disposed of unneccisarilly.
I bet what you were handling wasn’t -that- comparatively sensitive, so its a whole bunch of human effort and material being pulverised for no reason.
Because I can ensure you that the people who should -always- be that thorough are not. Especially right now. There’s all sorts of drives that shouldn’t be out in the wild, out in the wild.
I’m a little surprised there isn’t buyers for liberated disks (and their data) from ASEAN datacenters.
Additionally, if an attacker wanted to steal your business data, they’d be your contracted, approved disposal partner already.


I can tell you right now that not everything that goes to recycler and gets a cert even gets wiped.
Someone, somewhere said it was, therefore, the box is ticked.
And this will remain so until there isn’t an economic imperative.


Some people have access to corporate cast-offs, so there are some people sat on massive supplies of used gear… It all disappears somewhere eventually 🤭
The problem is is that I severely doubt that there’s anything of value on it. Have you any idea how many disks are full of banal static?