Was surprised to see this here. But yes absolutely, they are expensive don’t get me wrong. But they are worth it. Their shit just works, i have their washer and heat pump dryer, dishwasher, and CX1 canister vacuum. Each are the best version of that thing I’ve ever used. Dishwasher will clean anything no rinse/soak needed even for baked on pasta or cheese, vacuum is powerful but also shockingly quiet, dryer sips power (700w avg load) but dries everything just fine.

Had em for the years now, i am NOT gentle with the vacuum i drag it outside to clean the car and other various things it’s not really for, toss it around use it as a footstool sometimes and it shows no signs of the wear. You get what you pay for with them

Only female bees have stingers tho

It just creates unnecessary complication. It’s not particularly memorable, it’s a pain to even just lookup tye syntax imo compared with v4, and I genuinely do not see the benefit at the home level to getting rid of NAT. Carrier and backhaul? Oh yeah nat is a fucking plague. But home level? Literally causes no issues it’s trivial to work with, 98% of people do not need ports forwarded ever. Those that do it’s not hard. IPV6 necessitates more careful control of a firewall now that every device is globally reachable and means that it won’t even make opening a service any easier. It’s just firewall instead of NAT forward which on most routers will more or less be the same process

6to4 exists and could handle translation of the backhaul 6 to a local 4. Only the router itself need be directly addressable imo.

I’m not, and I’ll never give it up on any network i control. It’s simple, easy to remember, i don’t personally need 255 ip addresses so ipv4 space is just fine for me. And i don’t need my devices to be individually addressable globally i can port forward if something needs to be accessed externally.

IPv6 makes sense at the carrier level but at the endpoint networks especially just for homes there is literally nothing wrong with ipv4