Not really, because we’re talking about what serves people best.
Most people have homes under virtually any political and economic system. So, when we do compare, we know capitalism fails us way more often.
Not really, because we’re talking about what serves people best.
Most people have homes under virtually any political and economic system. So, when we do compare, we know capitalism fails us way more often.
Sure, simply providing housing may not solve everything, and complex measures must be taken to ensure mental wellbeing, fiscal responsibility, lack of addictions etc.
But housing and income must come first, as not having that prevents effective therapy. When you’re in survival mode, you’re not particularly productive resolving your other issues.
Again, hopefully these are all jokes.
Capitalism doesn’t bring us anything; it’s a distribution system. No machines will suddenly disappear if it’s gone, no researchers, developers and engineers will suddenly die, and the world will just keep spinning.
Hopefully you’re joking, but in case you are not: poverty is not due to lack of resources, but the problems around their distribution.
Killing the poor will just make those previously better off drift into the poor category.
Even if only the richest 1% survives, most of them will lose their positions and become poor, as there will be no workforce, inflation will go through the roof, and a competition will play out all over again, leading some to be the masters and some to be the slaves.
There, the solution!
Repay everyone exactly as much tolerance as they give to you
Absolutely. Not housing only, but housing first. The rest should come as well.