Sprinkle in a little bias, a little propaganda, a little mythology, then lose 75% of the information, and you’ve got the Eastern understanding of Asian history.
Same goes for the Western understanding of Caucasian history, of course.
There is no discoverable objective reality when it comes to history. Not even the people in the moment at any given point in history really understand what’s going on. It’s all a construct.
Caucasian: of or relating to a group of people having European ancestry, classified according to physical traits (such as light skin pigmentation), and formerly considered to constitute a race (see RACE entry 1 sense 1a) of humans
There is no discoverable objective reality when it comes to history. Not even the people in the moment at any given point in history really understand what’s going on. It’s all a construct
Well functionally, it’s the same difference, because we’re all stuck drawing the cat with the material conditions of a shitty pencil and piece of paper.
Sprinkle in a little bias, a little propaganda, a little mythology, then lose 75% of the information, and you’ve got the Eastern understanding of Asian history.
Same goes for the Western understanding of Caucasian history, of course.
There is no discoverable objective reality when it comes to history. Not even the people in the moment at any given point in history really understand what’s going on. It’s all a construct.
What does the West (ie Western Europeans) and the people of the Caucasus region have to do with each other? 😅
Caucasian: of or relating to a group of people having European ancestry, classified according to physical traits (such as light skin pigmentation), and formerly considered to constitute a race (see RACE entry 1 sense 1a) of humans
What no historical materialism does to a mf
Great response, saved me from figuring out how to even engage with that.
Well functionally, it’s the same difference, because we’re all stuck drawing the cat with the material conditions of a shitty pencil and piece of paper.