RobotToaster@mander.xyz to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 months agoUK cinemas look at banning Meta smart glasses over piracy fearswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square29linkfedilinkarrow-up1181arrow-down12
arrow-up1179arrow-down1external-linkUK cinemas look at banning Meta smart glasses over piracy fearswww.theguardian.comRobotToaster@mander.xyz to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square29linkfedilink
minus-squarecmnybo@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months agoYou don’t need cameras to generate subtitles.
minus-squareschipelblorp@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoTrue, but the display is there to show the subtitles, and it’s much better than looking down at a phone and distracting other audience members.
minus-squareWhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 months agoyou can have a smart glass without camera make subtitles
minus-squarejumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·2 months agothe display is much more expensive than the camera so if there is any utility in there being a camer there is no reason to not have it
minus-squareWhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agooh lol. there’s a lot of reason. It’s called privacy. we shouldn’t stop there though, we need to get “laws” on that list too.
You don’t need cameras to generate subtitles.
True, but the display is there to show the subtitles, and it’s much better than looking down at a phone and distracting other audience members.
you can have a smart glass without camera make subtitles
the display is much more expensive than the camera so if there is any utility in there being a camer there is no reason to not have it
oh lol. there’s a lot of reason. It’s called privacy. we shouldn’t stop there though, we need to get “laws” on that list too.