• RiverRock@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    So what I’m getting from this definition is that any military action across a national border for any reason other than, i guess, pure moral altruistim, is imperialism. Is that the conclusion you mean to build to?

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Just straight up admitting you’ve defined imperialism so broadly as to be meaningless

      • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yeah I agree. So does that make all military conflict that crosses a national border imperialism or does it not?

        • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I don’t “want to built to” any conclusion. I gave one definition. And your conclusion, according to that definition is correct.

          • KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            It’s “anarchists” like you why people call it anarkiddies. Read theory then you won’t sound as stupid as you do in this thread