jankforlife@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 days agozionazi libs b like "its good actually"lemmy.mlimagemessage-square116linkfedilinkarrow-up1148arrow-down197file-text
arrow-up151arrow-down1imagezionazi libs b like "its good actually"lemmy.mljankforlife@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 days agomessage-square116linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarepotustheplant@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·10 hours agoYou replied to the wrong comment then ¯\_ (ツ)_/¯ why would you reply to the second comment if you were referring to the first?
minus-square1Malayali@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·9 hours agoBecause it was a continuation of the convo?
minus-squarepotustheplant@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·5 hours agoDidn’t seem that way since neither the original comment nor their response is an “ad hominem” attack. But ok dude, you do you.
minus-square1Malayali@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·3 hours agoIt may have seemed like that since you were not the commentor who I was replying to and did not follow the comment chain. And I did ask if it would be better to term it as ‘poisoning the well’. But ok dude, you do you.
You replied to the wrong comment then ¯\_ (ツ)_/¯ why would you reply to the second comment if you were referring to the first?
Because it was a continuation of the convo?
Didn’t seem that way since neither the original comment nor their response is an “ad hominem” attack. But ok dude, you do you.
It may have seemed like that since you were not the commentor who I was replying to and did not follow the comment chain. And I did ask if it would be better to term it as ‘poisoning the well’.
But ok dude, you do you.