• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    There’s an ideological slant to PieFed for sure, and it’s very much in favor of the left. That could be why maga.place and lemmychan.org use Lemmy and not PieFed.

    PieFed bakes in preferences against left wing groups, and you’ve been launching a crusade against anarchist instances lately. As much as you believe yourself to be left, you’ve done your best to left-punch wherever you can, and have unilaterally made decisions greatly impacting the functionality of PieFed to suit your overwhelmingly liberal views. This isn’t even getting into how you agree with racist conspiracy theories like the idea that China is kidnapping people for organ harvesting.

    Also, it’s nice that you admit that PieFed has an ideological slant and that you do develop PieFed with that in mind, socsa swore up and down that that wasn’t the case for some reason.

    Also, since Rimu permabanned me from Piefed.social at PugJesus’ behest after I critiqued PJ’s views from the left, they won’t see my comment, sadly.

        • Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          2 days ago

          Rimu is single handedly generating so much misinformation and nonsense that essentially anyone else who works on Piefed alongside of him is becoming radioactive. Not sure how much I want to trust someone who is willing to help further Rimu’s behavior. Working on Piefed used to be a bullet point and it is rapidly turning into an asterisk.

        • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          2 days ago

          Modlog Reason for the action is only shown if it is from trusted instances, so abusive mods wont have an audience. Admins can still see the reason though.

          pughitler is a mod on piefed.social and nobody seems to care about his abusive behavior.

          rimu gets temporarily banned for ‘emulating a zionist’ and now suddenly it’s a priority to address moderator abuse… via censorship shocked-pikachu

          incredible

          • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            2 days ago

            pughitler is a mod on piefed.social and nobody seems to care about his abusive behavior.

            Don’t you dare call out his actions, but he’ll gladly smear you over his private kingdoms where you can’t defend yourself.

        • Goferking0@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m sure it’s been in the pipeline a while but the instance silencing feature being added is great timing

    • Goferking0@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s also very telling they named it noqanon.

      While sounds great weird that would trigger ml warnings as no one would consider qanon that

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yep, Rimu does the tactic of conflating the left and the right to make their position as a right-wing liberal seem to be left. It’s just rehashed horseshoe theory bullshit.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        The noqanon list and the OP warning sign are two different things.

        The first is a default url blocklist that gets pulled on first start of a Piefed instance and which contains extreme right-wing and mis-information outlets.

        The domain warning sign mentioned in OP is a separate list only manually added to the piefed.social flagship instance.

        • Goferking0@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          3 days ago

          This gets back to how poorly designed piefed is and rimus explanations.

          The domain block list having more than qanon and being part of the install while not saying anything about what it actually brings in is poor design choice. Along with it apparently only being disabled by individually checking the list in the ui.

          The domain warning sign mentioned in OP is a separate list only manually added to the piefed.social flagship instance

          Rimu made it sound like they were connected in the qanon repo