DEATH TO ZIONAZIS

  • m532@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    A health invention in a vacuum is useless.

    If you have health inventions but then withhold them from poor people, average livespan will increase very little.

    If you have health inventions and then make a system that supplies those to everyone, average lifespan will increase very much.

    • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtfBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      in 1945, penicillin became widely available, we have no proof that stalin caused it

        • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtfBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          more like “yay we found out how to mass produce commercial penicillin” “no no no our Leader Comrade Stalin did”

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                1 day ago

                The distribution of medicine in the USSR, a much poorer country, was widely available because of the socialist economy and distribution of resources. Medicine does not magically appear, economics decides how and where it goes.

      • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        The fact the majority of the global south didn’t see comparable life expectancy spikes of the same degree as socialist countries and the fact life expectancy plunged post socialism in eastern Europe really points to the system having a great effect on life expectancy.

        • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtfBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          the global south were experiencing multiple famines due to the British at that time.

          And the life expectancy plunged after the collapse of the USSR as multiple countries with NEW goverments just didnt know what to do and it took them decades to stabilize

          • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 day ago

            Colonial famines only explain the starting point. The real explanation is that the Global South largely stayed locked into capitalist extraction chains. Core economies required cheap labor and raw materials from the periphery. That structural position kept mortality high and blocked independent development. Socialist states broke that dependency. They redirected surplus into public health, housing, and food security. The outcomes of this are obvious, life expectancy doubled in a generation, infant mortality collapsed. The material basis improved because production answered human needs instead of profit margins. The idea of post soviet governments simply being confused and not knowing better is a nice fantasy but is completely detached from reality. The mortality spike was not administrative error. It was policy. Shock therapy dismantled central planning. State enterprises were liquidated. Housing guarantees were revoked. Social services were defunded. Mass unemployment followed overnight.

            The new governments knew exactly what they were building. They replaced planned distribution with market extraction. The human toll was accepted as transition cost. Capitalism does not stumble into crisis. It manufactures crisis through deliberate dispossession.

          • orc girly@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            multiple countries with NEW goverments just didnt know what to do

            Neoliberal shock doctrine seems deliberate to me, not a lack of expertise in government