reposting to see how much the lemmyverse has learned since the last time: https://lemmy.ml/post/7927508

the ultimate police state - ‘security’ is one of their top exports

  • abbotsbury@lemmy.worldBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    “BlueMAGA” is a false equivalence derived from horseshoe fallacy. The crazy fringe of Democrats aren’t as numerous, nor as influential, nor as crazy, as MAGA.

    If you have actual criticisms of Democrats, go ahead and make them, but constructing this “equal and opposite” both-sides trash is a thought terminating cliche.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      “saying these two right wing groups are similar is horseshoe theory”

      Imagine if words had meaning.

      Not to mention that BlueMAGA is the core of the democrats, not the fringe

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      BlueMAGA has nothing to do with horseshoe theory, horseshoe theory is the false idea that the far-left and far-right, ie communists and fascists, are more similar than different. BlueMAGA is about liberalism being closer to fascism than any kind of leftism, given bipartisan support for capitalism, imperialism, neocolonialism, and genocide abroad. It isn’t “both sides bad,” it’s “the DNC and GOP are on the same side of capital.”

    • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      No it isn’t derived from horseshoe fallacy because the dems arent left. They’re far right warhawks who openly support genocide. They have an “America first” mindset, believe in “American exceptionalism”, are zionists to the marrow of their bones, believe in militarization, warfare, built concentration camps for migrants and have people chanting “blue no matter who”. They are the exact same party in a different color with an even stupider mascot.

      • abbotsbury@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        They are the exact same party

        Except they clearly aren’t, if you cannot recognize that Democrats are literally not as bad as Republicans, you’re living outside reality.

        • m532@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 hours ago

          They’re worse. They’re just as warmongering, but the eu puppets worship them instead of hating them.

            • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Your daily reminder that western supremacists don’t consider non-westeners to be people

                • EmmiLime@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  19 minutes ago

                  why would Democrats not be the clear superior if only because they don’t cause needless suffering to interior minorities?

                  HAHAHAHA holy fuck. Shut the fuck up you genociding Nazi and go back you reddit

                • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  A strawman isn’t just “an argument I don’t like but don’t have a refutation for”.

                  Seems like you’re the one

                  Fuck off, you absolute mindless cretin

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      “bluemaga” is an observation that no, democrats are not the opposite of republicans.

      they are fascist imperialists just like republicans. the difference is they are polite and charismatic.

      • abbotsbury@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        the difference is they are polite and charismatic

        Well, and less genocide and human rights abuse, as even the person I replied to could admit.

        • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Daniel Democrat beats a man 49% to death with a lead pipe, then Robert Republican takes his turn and does the other 51%. The man is now a smear on the floor.

          Daniel Democrat turns to the police and says “Why are you questioning me, the other guy did it more!”

          Shut up, you’re both going to prison.

          • abbotsbury@lemmy.worldBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            5 hours ago

            You haven’t demonstrated why I shouldn’t favor the person that doesn’t beat a man to death

            • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              You’re pretending to be a moron to avoid culpability for your fascism, and it will one day end badly for you. Try this line of bullshit in Palestine.

        • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          i don’t see anyone admitting to anything, just you being insistent. your country has been genociding and abusing human rights for decades under democrats and republicans pretty much equally. i can’t think of a single recent us president that wasn’t a war criminal.

          can you?

    • EmmiLime@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      lol the Democrats and Republicans ARE the same. Their foreign policies are the exact same.

      And I don’t give one single fuck about domestic policies, all it does is say that Americans care more about their own comfort and will allow the killing and exploitation of poorer countries for that to happen.

      The crazy fringe of Democrats aren’t as numerous, nor as influential, nor as crazy, as MAGA.

      That’s focusing on the decorum over all else. You don’t think that the reputation of the US and the chaos is all Trump or Republicans… do you?

      • abbotsbury@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        1 day ago

        lol the Democrats and Republicans ARE the same. Their foreign policies are the exact same.

        Just blatantly untrue, even the person I replied to could admit there would at least be less genocide and human rights abuse.

        That’s focusing on the decorum over all else

        Not at all, nice strawman though. Crazy and influential refers to political goals and political power

        • orc girly@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          there would at least be less genocide and human rights abuse.

          Please look at all the shit Obama did, including authorizing killing random civilians in neutral countries and destroying Libya.

          Biden gave a green light for the extermination of Palestinians in Gaza.

          To us in the global south the difference isn’t that big beyond aesthetics. I don’t feel reassured if a democrat is in office because we’ll be hit hard with IMF extortion starving our children, forcing us to give our resources and do a regime change or an invasion if we refuse, and other bullshit like that whether there’s a democrat there or not.

          But for the sake of argument, let’s pretend the democrats are substantially better abroad. Harris campaigned on having the most lethal army, democrats being the toughest on the border and continuing the genocide in Gaza. If they aren’t willing to do anything better than that then they don’t deserve anyone’s votes.

          • abbotsbury@lemmy.worldBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            1 day ago

            I didn’t say Democrats are good, I said they’re better.

            If they aren’t willing to do anything better than that then they don’t deserve anyone’s votes.

            I dunno, I think if even a single life is saved by voting for a Democrat, that would have been worth it.

            There are things America does, which is bad and both Democrats and Republicans are guilty of, and there are ways Republicans are much worse. American imperialism will not be undone in a single election, and refusing to partake in incremental progress (or at least harm reduction) is throwing away any impact you could have in the system. Well, not you, but there are marginalized groups interior to the United States which face more oppression under Trump than they ever would under Harris, and saying their lives and suffering don’t matter because “America gonna America” is just cold blooded. It’s a really basic trolley problem and I have problems with the people who think they’re above pulling a lever because both tracks have bodies on them.

            Yes America bad, and yes Democrats bad, but sometimes they’re the best choice available.

            • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 hours ago

              The harm reduction choice is the one that causes the US to collapse the fastest. If you were actually serious about undoing American imperialism, you would not be advocating for supporting a party that upholds and maintains it. But you don’t actually see this theory a utilitarian lense: you only care about the trolly going down the track you’re not on.

              • abbotsbury@lemmy.worldBanned from community
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                5 hours ago

                The harm reduction choice is the one that causes the US to collapse the fastest

                That’s accelerationism and shows disregard for the suffering it will cause.

                • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  Lol. What happened to pragmatic harm reduction? You were perfectly happy to disregard the suffering caused to the victims of American imperialism… But of course, you don’t actually consider them people, which is why you can suddenly do a complete 180 on your previous stance without even thinking about it when white people might be the ones to suffer.

            • EmmiLime@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              24 hours ago

              It is not worth voting for Democrat because you are still giving into the system and enabling genocide and exploitation. The entire system has to be overthrown.

              It’s funny to see liberals constantly rely on VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO that they’re just mad that Trump is ® and not (D). You don’t care about marginalized groups by the way, that is for sure.

              Marginalized groups have been under attack for decades and nothing has changed but it getting faster. And a liberal argument is that they want them to be killed slowly, while thinking that others opposed to this system just want them killed faster and therefore are bigoted. But herein lies the issue, why do liberals want marginalized groups to be killed slowly and out of view, instead of tackling this real issue head-on?

              Democrats are pro-ICE, they think it just needs to be reformed. They only truly got mad when 2 white people got killed. Governor Tim Walz thinks that the problem with ICE is they need to do it during the night and not disturb people. (Does that sound like someone opposed to targeting marginalized people???)

              Under Obama, ICE ramped up a lot and there were a lot of drone strikes on innocent people under his rule. But it’s all excused because he was “polite” about it, further cementing that Democrats/Liberals only care about looking righteous, not being that.

              How about Kamala Harris? Who is a brutal prison cop that also had unconditional support for “Israel” and considered Iran to be the biggest threat. Who was making fun of Trump that he wasn’t deporting ENOUGH people!??!? She was platforming on being even tougher on borders. The reason people want Kamala is because they want a girlboss as a war criminal, because it’s sexist not to also let women order strikes on people in other countries, instead of just throwing and burning this system overall.

              Or Gavin Newsom? Who personally attended and participated in destroying homeless people’s camps? Who has complete support for “Israel”, just like Tim Walz and Kamala Harris. Who is also pro-ICE. Gavin is a horrible person too but the “VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO” insist even Gavin Newsom. Why? Because anything to get a Democrat, even if it’s Hitler. And guess what, that kind of thinking is just like MAGA and Republicans, who also vote Red no matter what. And the problem with “VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO” is that you’d even vote for Trump if he ran as a Democrat lmao.

              Just so you know, it’s incredibly selfish and self-centered to argue only for domestic policies because it’s “as good as it gets” and “lesser of 2 evils”. It’s resigning from responsibility of enabling brutal genocide and exploitation as well as throwing the entire global south under the bus for your own well-being.

              The people of Iran don’t care if the bombs dropped on them have (D) or ®… because a bomb is A FUCKING BOMB!!!

              • abbotsbury@lemmy.worldBanned from community
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                5 hours ago

                It is not worth voting for Democrat because you are still giving into the system and enabling genocide and exploitation

                Why is giving into the system, in order of SOME less suffering, not an option?

                • EmmiLime@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  23 minutes ago

                  lol so fucking typical of a shitlib that you can only respond to that, do it badly and also not read and understand the rest of what I said. Go back to reddit you fucking dumbass

    • m532@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The name is a bit misleading, as they’re not reactionaries who want to go back to an imaginary idealized past, but conservatives who want to conserve the past status quo. They’re more like Blue Make A Keep Being Imperialist.

      But their strategy is really “interesting”. If they convince enough people that they’re still a powerful empire, their empire will magically stay strong (bending reality to their will, idealism logic, jedi logic).

      Now there’s two kinds of people that they hate: people who powerfully fight back and therefore show the empire’s weaknesses (russians and iranians), and people who notice the empire’s material weakness and try to do something about it (fascists).

      Both show the material reality that the empire is weak, so both (including their supporters) are considered traitors to the idealist imperialist cause. That’s where all the trump = putin bullshit comes from.

      Idealist magic supposedly only works if every imperial citizen (the other people have already been dehumanized and therefore don’t count) believes in it, that’s why radlibs become so angry at nonbelievers. “If only the nonbelievers would all believe, we could have genocided russia with our minds alone long ago”, they think.

      Then the question becomes, why don’t they just murder the nonbelievers? They try, by trying to convince everyone that the nonbelievers are dumb and lesser and all sorts of things, but that just doesn’t kill them irl.

      • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        they’re not reactionaries who want to go back to an imaginary idealized past

        I go back and forth on this. I kind of think they actually are, but instead of wanting to return to a 1950s coke commercial, they want to return to the 90s and do the macaroni forever at the end of history.