cm0002@europe.pub to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 12 hours agoSupreme Court rules ISPs aren't liable for user piracy without intentwww.techspot.comexternal-linkmessage-square6linkfedilinkarrow-up170arrow-down11cross-posted to: fediverse@lemmy.ml
arrow-up169arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court rules ISPs aren't liable for user piracy without intentwww.techspot.comcm0002@europe.pub to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 12 hours agomessage-square6linkfedilinkcross-posted to: fediverse@lemmy.ml
minus-squareVenia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·11 hours agowth does “without intent” mean? Like, ooops my AI accidentally 1.41 TB of books and movies?
minus-squarecm0002@europe.pubOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·10 hours agoIntent meaning they’re not an ISP that caters to piracy E.g. you start an ISP called Pirate Connections, advertise that you cater to piracy and have specific piracy friendly features (optimized for torrents, gang planks, minimal logging etc) is bad
wth does “without intent” mean? Like, ooops my AI accidentally 1.41 TB of books and movies?
Intent meaning they’re not an ISP that caters to piracy
E.g. you start an ISP called Pirate Connections, advertise that you cater to piracy and have specific piracy friendly features (optimized for torrents, gang planks, minimal logging etc) is bad