• Bloomcole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I think you’re misinformed. Iran has superior tech.
    Even hypersonic missiles the US can’t even make.
    They can go 1000’s of km with an accuracy of 10 meters.
    As proven by direct hits on radars in the US vassal countries.
    DEbris from a downed drone, failed AD,etc can cause civilian casualties.
    Iran doesn’t target civilians, it’s not their style unlike the other side.

    • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      wouldn’t be surprised they have a few expensive high precision, and a large mass of cheaper low precision. but i just woke up and haven’t had my coffee, so I don’t feel like going through Iranian rocket types

      • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        More than a few, all they used up to now is old stuff mostly.
        You should really keep up.
        They explained they would use them first, together with cheap drones to make the USSA, the genocider state and US vassals use up all their AD.
        Take out the radars making them blind and then send the good stuff.

        Contrary the USSA they have meticulously planned, did everything they would do and achieved every goal so far, and more.
        In that sense it’s really is satisfying to watch, despite the innocents dying.

        • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I’m assuming you’re from a country where plural words in acronyms get doubled, like Spanish.

          English does not do that, so it’s USA. USSA sounds like an amalgam of USSR and USSA, and it’s confusion. unless it’s an intention change, like IOF instead of IDF.

          English isn’t my first language either.