• Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Private banks would not relinquish the power and profit they get from the need of a bank account with them in order to be able to pay electronically. In reality central banks can reliaby provide that ability to the people in their jurisdictions. But private bank interests stand in the way of that.

  • solrize@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    There’s tons of regulatory hurdles to operating any kind of money transmitter, at least in the US. Also, Taler is designed to be reversible which is problematic in some situations. The opposite is of course problematic in other situations.

    Chaum’s original digicash patents are long expired by now. I wonder if those schemes should be revisited.

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Tried the demo a little while ago, ready to use whenever it’s being actually usable.

  • sam@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I would love an ethical solution to banks and currency. I think it’s one of the most important areas for decentralisation.

  • asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Sure. Why not?

    While not a very well known project, Crowdbucks’s (a Liberapay/Kofi alternative for the Fediverse) dev told me that he was investigating how GNU Taler works and wanted to implement support for it in his project: https://mastodon.social/@reiver/115097895209652675

    Liberapay’s team should also be working on implementing support for it. They got a grant specifically for that: https://nlnet.nl/project/TALER-Liberapay/

    If we are lucky, we will see GNU Taler being used by the EU as the system behind the digital euro in a few years. Then it most likely will become mainstream.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Wero is a trap at best or more likely a figleaf that is meant to fail.

      EU private banks much prefer the status quo over systems like the Brazilian PIX taking over the digital payment systems.

      So when the EU central bank started looking into a sovereign alternative to Visa/Mastercard etc. the private banks scrambled to put together Wero to delay and maybe prevent the central bank from coming up with a system like PIX.

      Sadly GNU Taler was never really an option for these banks, as it is an open standard and thus even if they supported it, the central bank could still plug into it with their own system and thus they would be forced to compete with that.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Taler is centralized and has poor privacy protections

      This is non-sense. It’s not centralized at all and the privacy protections are excellent, just designed to different specs (privacy for buyers, but not sellers).

      • silverpill@mitra.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        35 minutes ago

        It’s not centralized at all

        It depends on the banking system with its proprietary APIs and centralized money issuance.

        privacy for buyers, but not sellers

        In order to spend money, you need to receive it first. I don’t know if it makes you a “seller” in Taler, but in any case, this partial protection probably makes de-anonymization of all transactions via statistical analysis much easier.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 minutes ago

          It depends on the banking system with its proprietary APIs and centralized money issuance.

          It does not. That is as optional as fiat exchanges with cryptocurrencies.

          In order to spend money, you need to receive it first. I don’t know if it makes you a “seller” in Taler, but in any case, this partial protection probably makes de-anonymization of all transactions via statistical analysis much easier.

          No, you get it from an exchange. And the resulting tokens are like physical cash and can not be de-anonymized by the exchange or anyone else in the chain. That’s like the entire point of Taler. I think you should really inform yourself better before making yourself look really stupid by confidently spreading such non-sense.