Sucks…

tl;dr

Tachiyomi will no longer be actively developed. It may continue to work for you for the foreseeable future but there will be no support for it nor the official extensions.

  • Gunpachi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    R.I.P tachiyomi, I have used it for years. Kind of sad to see it go. Are the forks also abandoning development ? I have been using the TachiJ2k fork for the past 3 years or so.

    I guess I will be shifting to kotatsu soon.

    • @ppfdee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      106 months ago

      TachiyomiSY will still be actively developed. No idea about J2K but I read somewhere that the dev will implement third party repo support sometime next week so I guess that’s a sign.

        • @ppfdee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Yeah Mihon is the successor to Tachyomi but TachyomiSY’s dev also clarified that he’ll still be working on SY as its own thing.

          • @spiderman@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I don’t know why they want to continue working on two different things when one clearly tries to be a successor.

            • @IronKrill@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              66 months ago

              I use SY and I get the sense that Bobby is more of a fast and loose type while the Mihon dev is focused more on polish. My assumptions are based on the unpolished nature of SY features and the Mihon dev saying “some of us liked plain Tachiyomi” [sic].

              • @spiderman@ani.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                36 months ago

                I just downloaded TachiyomiSY before a week and I liked how it was better than TachiyomiSY in feature wise. I think Bobby is a dev who focuses more on features aspect. So if the other dev focuses on user interface, I hope it might be a good pair.

              • @spiderman@ani.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                16 months ago

                more options are definitely good if the developers are different, i hope the devs aren’t burner out by developing two applications serving the same purpose.